There’s been oh so much to go around these last few days, that, since I missed Mass, I have some time on this lunch break to point out a few issues well worth bringing up…
On the subject of Obama’s new faith based initiatives, I think it’s important to recognize just how sleazy and backwards his plan is. While ostensibly increasing the program’s funding, he also wants to effectively castrate it. The AP’s line that he would “support [religious group’s] ability to hire and fire based on faith” to the contrary, the speech itself states that Obama’s first basic principle is that “if you get a federal grant, you can’t use that grant money to … discriminate against [the people you help] – or against the people you hire – on the basis of their religion.”
Now I don’t have a problem with a prohibition on discriminating among those you help — the government isn’t funding the programs to help only Catholics, Jews, Muslims, or Buddhists — but religious groups ought to be able to discriminate in who they hire based upon their religion. Look at the alternative: it would make it illegal for a Jewish group to refuse to hire an anti-Semite, a Catholic group to refuse to hire a Satanist, or an atheist to refuse to hire an Evangelical. Obama could have scored some points here, but since it can’t attract centrist evangelicals it may not go anywhere.
Swinging around the block to my home in Virginia, there’s the continuing story of the Richmond Diocese helping to procure an abortion, against the teachings of the Catholic Church and against Virginia state law. Now apparently the Bishop didn’t know about it until fairly late in the game, but he still knew about it the day before the abortion was to occur. At the very least this means that he should have gone and spoken with the young woman involved, but there is no indication of that. Better would have been to go to the police and report the commission of the crime — even if it meant some of his staff would go to jail for violating parental consent laws, fire the staffer sooner, and rein in the department (Commonwealth Catholic Charities) that procured it. It only gets worse when you find out that two months before the CCC had obtained contraceptives for the young mother involved. (Here’s a .pdf detailing it.)
I think Alberto Hurtado hits the nail on the head when he points out that we would never tolerate this sort of slow response to a crisis in politics, business, or any other field. Although I’ve been told that there’s more to the story, what is out there is fairly damning. So while I’m not at the point of saying that Bishop DiLorenzo should send Benedict a public letter requesting his permission to resign, whatever efforts he was making to clean up the diocese are clearly not working. It seems as though a much more thorough housecleaning is needed.
Finally, I’ll be hanging my head a bit this Fourth of July having read the news that we copied our interrogation techniques (at least in part) from those that Communist China used under Mao. It’s difficult to take pride in your country when it’s government tortures people. And if you don’t think it’s torture, I pass on this article by Christopher Hitchens (no pacifist he) on his experience with waterboarding and specifically this passage identified by Hurtado.
The interrogators would hardly have had time to ask me any questions, and I knew that I would quite readily have agreed to supply any answer. I still feel ashamed when I think about it. Also, in case it’s of interest, I have since woken up trying to push the bedcovers off my face, and if I do anything that makes me short of breath I find myself clawing at the air with a horrible sensation of smothering and claustrophobia. No doubt this will pass. As if detecting my misery and shame, one of my interrogators comfortingly said, “Any time is a long time when you’re breathing water.” I could have hugged him for saying so, and just then I was hit with a ghastly sense of the sadomasochistic dimension that underlies the relationship between the torturer and the tortured. I apply the Abraham Lincoln test for moral casuistry: “If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong.” Well, then, if waterboarding does not constitute torture, then there is no such thing as torture.